The Thinker: Is Atheism Allowed?
Senin, 30 Januari 2012 by ewepaksa
top custom html 3The Thinker: Is Atheism Allowed? Yordan Nugraha | Jan 27, 2012 
Alexander Aan, a subject retainer in Dharmasraya, West Sumatra, was maltreated and live with blasphemy after composition “God does not exist†on his Facebook page. The salutation has ranged from denunciation by individual planetary organizations to stop by topical citizens and the Asiatic Council of Ulema. Many grouping hit invoked the prototypal generalisation of Pancasila, the land ideology, to make the discussion that atheism â€" and herb â€" hit no locate in Indonesia. But is this rattling the case? Has atheism been illegal by Pancasila since the daybreak of the Asiatic state? Since the discussion is supported on the book of a jural document, let’s investigate this discourse from a jural perspective. The prototypal generalisation of Pancasila says the commonwealth of land shall be supported on the belief in the digit and exclusive God. It is commonly understood literally. As a result, nonbelievers, and atheists in particular, are ofttimes accused of violating the nation’s ideologic foundation. Their artefact of intellection is seen as clashing with the country’s basic “monotheistic†tenet. This is a naive and simple analyse of Pancasila. Interpreting some belief is not every most the exact message of the words; it is most environment and the systematical connections. In jural power there are digit methods of interpretation: arts and teleological. A arts rendering requires an communicating of the arts environment in which a enactment was created. With teleological reasoning, it is the content of a enactment that matters most. Historically, the prototypal generalisation of Pancasila, belief in digit dominant God, has been a cooperation between secular nationalists, Islamic nationalists and nationalists from added religions. It had its origins in the prototypal generalisation of the Djakarta Charter, the obligation to stop Muslims to Shariah law. When the non-Muslim subject founders protested the charger, a cooperation was reached: The belief in digit dominant God was cursive into Pancasila instead. If this arts environment is boost analyzed in a goal-oriented, teleological way, it is plain that the prototypal generalisation of Pancasila was not witting to forbiddance atheism. It was meant to alter unitedly the assorted religions of land in a fair-minded, flexible manner. Some strength ease implore that every enactment staleness be understood exactly as it was written. This, of course, is extremely questionable if you study the sextet officially “recognized religions†of Indonesia: Islam, Catholicism, Protestantism, Confucianism, belief and Buddhism. If the idea that the prototypal generalisation requires faith is correct, then at small digit of Indonesia’s constituted religions are apparently clashing with Pancasila. Hinduism is henotheistic, message Hindus pass the proximity of added gods despite attend exclusive one. That is ground we wager some gods in Bharat much as Ganesha, Vishnu and Shiva. Buddhism includes no construct of a glorious creator or deity; it is thoughtful a nontheistic religion. Sometimes the book “a not-born, a not-brought-to-being, a not-made, a not-conditioned“ in religion scripture are cited to stop the verify that faith has a creator. But a fireman countenance at the book shows that the book intend to nirvana, not to a god. Are belief and faith unconstitutional? Do they merit no locate in Indonesia? Should they be banned? Our origination fathers should hit expected this problem. Meanwhile, modify if the foolish exact rendering prevails, the grouping who angle on that to reassert their attitude against atheism module separate into added problem. There is added foundational lawmaking in Pancasila that addresses churchlike beliefs. This digit stipulates that “the belief in digit and dominant God staleness not be unnatural on added person.†This saucer is limited in nature, patch the prototypal generalisation is general. According to the jural belief of lex specialis, limited laws reverse generalized laws. This effectuation that atheists hit a correct to their beliefs, and cannot be unnatural to accept the views of others. Ironically, this shows that the grouping who essay to obligate God on atheists are actually the ones infringing on Pancasila. Atheism does not break Pancasila. All Indonesians haw consciously and rationally opt their possess beliefs. The country’s rattling groundwork protects their correct to do so. Yordan Nugraha is a enrollee of planetary and dweller accumulation at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/opini...allowed/493900 mo ateis kek, mo GKI yasmin kek, mo Syiah kek, semua punya hak untuk percaya apa yang mereka mau, dan negara nggak berhak untuk mengekang itubottom custom html 3
Google
Alexander Aan, a subject retainer in Dharmasraya, West Sumatra, was maltreated and live with blasphemy after composition “God does not exist†on his Facebook page. The salutation has ranged from denunciation by individual planetary organizations to stop by topical citizens and the Asiatic Council of Ulema. Many grouping hit invoked the prototypal generalisation of Pancasila, the land ideology, to make the discussion that atheism â€" and herb â€" hit no locate in Indonesia. But is this rattling the case? Has atheism been illegal by Pancasila since the daybreak of the Asiatic state? Since the discussion is supported on the book of a jural document, let’s investigate this discourse from a jural perspective. The prototypal generalisation of Pancasila says the commonwealth of land shall be supported on the belief in the digit and exclusive God. It is commonly understood literally. As a result, nonbelievers, and atheists in particular, are ofttimes accused of violating the nation’s ideologic foundation. Their artefact of intellection is seen as clashing with the country’s basic “monotheistic†tenet. This is a naive and simple analyse of Pancasila. Interpreting some belief is not every most the exact message of the words; it is most environment and the systematical connections. In jural power there are digit methods of interpretation: arts and teleological. A arts rendering requires an communicating of the arts environment in which a enactment was created. With teleological reasoning, it is the content of a enactment that matters most. Historically, the prototypal generalisation of Pancasila, belief in digit dominant God, has been a cooperation between secular nationalists, Islamic nationalists and nationalists from added religions. It had its origins in the prototypal generalisation of the Djakarta Charter, the obligation to stop Muslims to Shariah law. When the non-Muslim subject founders protested the charger, a cooperation was reached: The belief in digit dominant God was cursive into Pancasila instead. If this arts environment is boost analyzed in a goal-oriented, teleological way, it is plain that the prototypal generalisation of Pancasila was not witting to forbiddance atheism. It was meant to alter unitedly the assorted religions of land in a fair-minded, flexible manner. Some strength ease implore that every enactment staleness be understood exactly as it was written. This, of course, is extremely questionable if you study the sextet officially “recognized religions†of Indonesia: Islam, Catholicism, Protestantism, Confucianism, belief and Buddhism. If the idea that the prototypal generalisation requires faith is correct, then at small digit of Indonesia’s constituted religions are apparently clashing with Pancasila. Hinduism is henotheistic, message Hindus pass the proximity of added gods despite attend exclusive one. That is ground we wager some gods in Bharat much as Ganesha, Vishnu and Shiva. Buddhism includes no construct of a glorious creator or deity; it is thoughtful a nontheistic religion. Sometimes the book “a not-born, a not-brought-to-being, a not-made, a not-conditioned“ in religion scripture are cited to stop the verify that faith has a creator. But a fireman countenance at the book shows that the book intend to nirvana, not to a god. Are belief and faith unconstitutional? Do they merit no locate in Indonesia? Should they be banned? Our origination fathers should hit expected this problem. Meanwhile, modify if the foolish exact rendering prevails, the grouping who angle on that to reassert their attitude against atheism module separate into added problem. There is added foundational lawmaking in Pancasila that addresses churchlike beliefs. This digit stipulates that “the belief in digit and dominant God staleness not be unnatural on added person.†This saucer is limited in nature, patch the prototypal generalisation is general. According to the jural belief of lex specialis, limited laws reverse generalized laws. This effectuation that atheists hit a correct to their beliefs, and cannot be unnatural to accept the views of others. Ironically, this shows that the grouping who essay to obligate God on atheists are actually the ones infringing on Pancasila. Atheism does not break Pancasila. All Indonesians haw consciously and rationally opt their possess beliefs. The country’s rattling groundwork protects their correct to do so. Yordan Nugraha is a enrollee of planetary and dweller accumulation at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands. http://www.thejakartaglobe.com/opini...allowed/493900 mo ateis kek, mo GKI yasmin kek, mo Syiah kek, semua punya hak untuk percaya apa yang mereka mau, dan negara nggak berhak untuk mengekang itubottom custom html 3
Posting Komentar